Accommodating and compromising 8 minute dating new jersey

Both Accommodating and Compromising have a positive connotation.

accommodating and compromising-56

Accommodating and compromising

• Leads to solving the actual problem • Leads to a win-win outcome • Reinforces mutual trust and respect • Builds a foundation for effective collaboration in the future • Shared responsibility of the outcome • You earn the reputation of a good negotiator • Collaborating may not be practical when timing is crucial and a quick solution or fast response is required • Requires a commitment from all parties to look for a mutually acceptable solution • The process takes lots of time and energy • Some may take advantage of other people’s trust and openness • Faster issue resolution.

Compromising may be more practical when time is a factor • Can provide a temporary solution while still looking for a win-win solution • Lowers the levels of tension and stress resulting from the conflict • Important values and long-term objectives can be derailed in the process • May require close monitoring and control to ensure the agreements are met • May not work if initial demands are too great • Does not contribute to building trust in the long run • There is a risk to be abused, i.e.

Don't recycle conflict; once resolved, let it go and get back to your life" -- Bruce Barton in "Matthew" section of "I plead with Euodia and I plead with Syntyche to agree with each other in the Lord." -- Philippians 4:2 Team unity: 5 conflict management techniques Missionaries get into conflict with each other. Volunteers in ministry organizations find themselves in conflict.

Human relations managers in businesses often find themselves managing situations of inter-personal conflict.

It can be a useful tool to preserve the relationship.

But the drawback is that one’s true issues are not being met. And it can result in a loss in power or face over time, and it can be seen as the other person taking advantage of you.

Different stakeholders may have different priorities; conflicts may involve team members, departments, projects, organization and client, boss and subordinate, organization needs vs. Following are the techniques one needs to apply based on the circumstances.

Techniques should be evaluated and applied based on the own needs vs others needs • Collaborating – I win, you win • Compromising – Win some, lose some (You bend, I bend) • Accommodating – I lose, you win • Competing – I win, you lose • Avoiding – No winners, No losers In this post I am going to discuss the pros and cons of these techniques.

Collaborating is an assertive and cooperative approach.

Tags: , ,